A10-7300 vs Athlon II X3 440

CPU

GPU

A10-7300

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon II X3 440

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3 GHz2010

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A10-7300 vs Athlon II X3 440 Performance Spectrum

A10-7300

4 / 4

1,736

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X3 440

3 / 3

1,743

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7300 vs Athlon II X3 440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7300 vs Athlon II X3 440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7300

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 95W, a 91W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Athlon II X3 440 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,736 vs 1,743).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).

Athlon II X3 440

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 100.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.2 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2275% higher power demand at 95W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7300 better than Athlon II X3 440?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-7300 is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 440 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7300 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-7300 comes in 100.0% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II X3 440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.8% better value on paper (23.2 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-7300 vs Athlon II X3 440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7300

The A10-7300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,736 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II X3 440

The Athlon II X3 440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,743 points. Launch price was $47.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 440 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A10-7300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-7300 versus 3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 440 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the A10-7300 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10-7300 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X3 440 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7300 scores 1,736 against the Athlon II X3 440's 1,743 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II X3 440.

Feature	A10-7300	Athlon II X3 440
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+33%	3 / 3
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3 GHz+58%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark	1,736	1,743

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7300 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 440 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-7300 versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 440 — the A10-7300 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 440 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-7300) vs 0 (Athlon II X3 440) — the A10-7300 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A10-7300) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 440).

Feature	A10-7300	Athlon II X3 440
Socket	FP3	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7300) / not specified (Athlon II X3 440). The A10-7300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Athlon II X3 440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7300 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-7300 rivals Core i3-4010U.

Feature	A10-7300	Athlon II X3 440
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R6	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-7300 was priced at $150, while the Athlon II X3 440 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($150 vs $75), Athlon II X3 440 was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-7300 delivers 11.6 pts/$ vs 23.2 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 440 — making the Athlon II X3 440 the 67% better value option.

Feature	A10-7300	Athlon II X3 440
MSRP	$150	$75-50%
Performance per Dollar	11.6	23.2+100%
Release Date	2014	2010

Search A10-7300 on Amazon

Search Athlon II X3 440 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.