A10-7300
VS
Xeon E5405

A10-7300 vs Xeon E5405

AMD

A10-7300

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Xeon E5405

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-7300 is positioned at rank 1042 and the Xeon E5405 is on rank 906, so the Xeon E5405 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-7300

#1030
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2536%
#1031
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2499%
#1032
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2294%
#1033
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2283%
#1034
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2263%
#1036
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2185%
#1037
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2095%
#1038
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2092%
#1039
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2035%
#1042
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
100%
#1043
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
100%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
98%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
96%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
96%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
95%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
94%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5405

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
24770%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4677%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4155%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3210%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
100%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
99%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
99%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
98%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
98%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
97%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
97%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
95%
#516
Xeon E7-8867 v3
MSRP: $4672|Avg: $4672
94%
#517
Xeon Gold 6150
MSRP: $3358|Avg: $196
94%
#906
Xeon E5405
MSRP: $209|Avg: $15
100%
#907
Xeon E5-2440
MSRP: $728|Avg: $249
100%
#916
Xeon E5-2650L
MSRP: $748|Avg: $129
96%
#918
Xeon E5410
MSRP: $256|Avg: $20
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10-7300 (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10-7300Xeon E5405
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5405 (2007) relies on 45 nm technology and **DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10-7300Xeon E5405
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+237%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-7300 and Xeon E5405

AMD

A10-7300

The A10-7300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,736 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Xeon E5405

The Xeon E5405 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,753 points. Launch price was $209.

Processing Power

Both the A10-7300 and Xeon E5405 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-7300 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5405 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the A10-7300 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-7300 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5405 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7300 scores 1,736 against the Xeon E5405's 1,753 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5405.

FeatureA10-7300Xeon E5405
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
4096 kB
6 MB (total)+50%
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark
1,736
1,753
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7300 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5405 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-7300 versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon E5405 — the A10-7300 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5405 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-7300) vs 0 (Xeon E5405) — the A10-7300 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA10-7300Xeon E5405
Socket
FP3
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600+50%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7300) vs VT-x (Xeon E5405). The A10-7300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Xeon E5405 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7300 targets Laptop, Xeon E5405 targets Server. Direct competitor: A10-7300 rivals Core i3-4010U.

FeatureA10-7300Xeon E5405
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R6
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Laptop
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The A10-7300 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Xeon E5405 debuted at $209. At current prices ($50 vs $15), the Xeon E5405 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-7300 delivers 34.7 pts/$ vs 116.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5405 — making the Xeon E5405 the 108.4% better value option.

FeatureA10-7300Xeon E5405
MSRP
$150-28%
$209
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$15-70%
Performance per Dollar
34.7
116.9+237%
Release Date
2014
2007