A10-7300 vs Xeon E5502

CPU

GPU

A10-7300

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E5502

2 Cores2 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2009

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A10-7300 vs Xeon E5502 Performance Spectrum

A10-7300

4 / 4

1,736

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5502

2 / 2

1,725

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7300 vs Xeon E5502 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7300 vs Xeon E5502: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7300

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $38 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $188 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.6 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $188 MSRP).
✅Draws 4W instead of 80W, a 76W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Xeon E5502 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5502, which brings 2 cores / 2 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5502

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 2 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7300 across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,725 vs 1,736).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($188 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌1900% higher power demand at 80W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7300 better than Xeon E5502?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5502 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-7300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 43 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7300 is the better buy right now. A10-7300 comes in $38 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $188 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 26.1% better value on MSRP (11.6 vs 9.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7300 vs Xeon E5502 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7300

The A10-7300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,736 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon E5502

The Xeon E5502 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,725 points. Launch price was $95.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5502 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-7300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-7300 versus 1.87 GHz on the Xeon E5502 — a 52.5% clock advantage for the A10-7300 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A10-7300 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5502 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7300 scores 1,736 against the Xeon E5502's 1,725 — a 0.6% lead for the A10-7300.

Feature	A10-7300	Xeon E5502
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+71%	1.87 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz+2%	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,736	1,725
Geekbench 6 Single	—	200
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7300 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5502 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-7300 versus DDR3-800 on the Xeon E5502 — the A10-7300 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5502 supports up to 144 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A10-7300) vs 3 (Xeon E5502). PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-7300) vs 32 (Xeon E5502) — the Xeon E5502 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A10-7300) and Intel 5500,Intel 5520,Intel X58 (Xeon E5502).

Feature	A10-7300	Xeon E5502
Socket	FP3	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+100%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	144 GB+800%
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	32+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7300) vs true (Xeon E5502). The A10-7300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Xeon E5502 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7300 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-7300 rivals Core i3-4010U.

Feature	A10-7300	Xeon E5502
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R6	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-7300 was priced at $150, while the Xeon E5502 came in at $188. On launch pricing ($150 vs $188), A10-7300 was $38 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-7300 delivers 11.6 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5502 — making the A10-7300 the 23.1% better value option.

Feature	A10-7300	Xeon E5502
MSRP	$150-20%	$188
Performance per Dollar	11.6+26%	9.2
Release Date	2014	2009

Search A10-7300 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5502 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.