
Athlon X2 L310 vs Core 2 Duo T5750

Athlon X2 L310

Core 2 Duo T5750
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X2 L310 is positioned at rank 933 and the Core 2 Duo T5750 is on rank 28, so the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 L310
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5750
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon X2 L310 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($8) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Conesus (2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon X2 L310 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+149%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($8) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X2 L310 and Core 2 Duo T5750

Athlon X2 L310
The Athlon X2 L310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Conesus (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,747 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Duo T5750
The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon X2 L310 and Core 2 Duo T5750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Athlon X2 L310 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — a 50% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T5750. The Athlon X2 L310 uses the Conesus (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 L310 scores 1,747 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon X2 L310. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 120 vs 360, a 100% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 213 vs 680 (104.6% advantage for the Core 2 Duo T5750).
| Feature | Athlon X2 L310 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz+67% |
| Base Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Conesus (2009) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,747 | 1,738 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 120 | 360+200% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 213 | 680+219% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X2 L310 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Socket S1 (Athlon X2 L310) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750).
| Feature | Athlon X2 L310 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: Yes (Athlon X2 L310) vs None (Core 2 Duo T5750). Primary use case: Athlon X2 L310 targets Mobile, Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop.
| Feature | Athlon X2 L310 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | None |
| Target Use | Mobile | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
At current prices ($20 vs $8), the Core 2 Duo T5750 is $12 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 L310 delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 217.3 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T5750 — making the Core 2 Duo T5750 the 85.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X2 L310 | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $8-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.3 | 217.3+149% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















