Athlon X2 L310 vs Core 2 Duo T5750

Athlon X2 L310 vs Core 2 Duo T5750 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 L310

2 / 2

1,747

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T5750

2 / 2

1,738

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 L310 vs Core 2 Duo T5750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 L310 vs Core 2 Duo T5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 L310

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 2W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (213 vs 680).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T5750 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core 2 Duo T5750

2008

Why buy it

✅+219.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X2 L310 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌100% higher power demand at 2W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 L310 better than Core 2 Duo T5750?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X2 L310 is ahead with a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5750 pulls ahead with 219.2% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 219.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 L310 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 L310 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo T5750 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 219.2% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X2 L310 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X2 L310 vs Core 2 Duo T5750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 L310

The Athlon X2 L310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Conesus (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,747 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Duo T5750

The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X2 L310 and Core 2 Duo T5750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Athlon X2 L310 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — a 50% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T5750. The Athlon X2 L310 uses the Conesus (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 L310 scores 1,747 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon X2 L310. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 120 vs 360, a 100% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 213 vs 680 (104.6% advantage for the Core 2 Duo T5750).

Feature	Athlon X2 L310	Core 2 Duo T5750
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	2 GHz+67%
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Conesus (2009)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,747	1,738
Geekbench 6 Single	120	360+200%
Geekbench 6 Multi	213	680+219%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 L310 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Socket S1 (Athlon X2 L310) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750).

Feature	Athlon X2 L310	Core 2 Duo T5750
Socket	S1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: Yes (Athlon X2 L310) vs None (Core 2 Duo T5750). Primary use case: Athlon X2 L310 targets Mobile, Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop.