
A10-5745M

Athlon X2 L310
A10-5745M vs Athlon X2 L310 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-5745M vs Athlon X2 L310 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-5745M vs Athlon X2 L310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-5745M
2013Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8610G, while Athlon X2 L310 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- β2400% higher power demand at 25W vs 1W.
Athlon X2 L310
2009Why buy it
- β Draws 1W instead of 25W, a 24W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (1,747 vs 1,767).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while A10-5745M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βNo integrated graphics, while A10-5745M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-5745M better than Athlon X2 L310?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-5745M vs Athlon X2 L310 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5745M
The A10-5745M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013β2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,767 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon X2 L310
The Athlon X2 L310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Conesus (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,747 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The A10-5745M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X2 L310 offers 2 cores / 2 threads β the A10-5745M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the A10-5745M versus 1.2 GHz on the Athlon X2 L310 β a 82.9% clock advantage for the A10-5745M. The A10-5745M uses the Richland (2013β2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X2 L310 uses Conesus (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5745M scores 1,767 against the Athlon X2 L310's 1,747 β a 1.1% lead for the A10-5745M.
| Feature | A10-5745M | Athlon X2 L310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+142% | 1.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | β |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | β |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013β2014) | Conesus (2009) |
| PassMark | 1,767+1% | 1,747 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 120 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 213 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-5745M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X2 L310 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A10-5745M versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 L310 β the A10-5745M supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5745M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5745M) vs 0 (Athlon X2 L310) β the A10-5745M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-5745M) and Socket S1 (Athlon X2 L310).
| Feature | A10-5745M | Athlon X2 L310 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP2 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+100% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-5745M) vs Yes (Athlon X2 L310). The A10-5745M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8610G), while the Athlon X2 L310 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X2 L310 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A10-5745M rivals Core i3-4010U.
| Feature | A10-5745M | Athlon X2 L310 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8610G | β |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
| Target Use | β | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















