Athlon II X3 440 vs Athlon X2 L310

AMD

Athlon II X3 440

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Athlon X2 L310

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X3 440 vs Athlon X2 L310 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 440 vs Athlon X2 L310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 440 vs Athlon X2 L310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 440

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $25 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 33.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.2 vs 17.5 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,743 vs 1,747).
  • 9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.

Athlon X2 L310

2009

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X3 440 better than Athlon X2 L310?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X3 440 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 L310 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 L310 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon II X3 440 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X3 440 comes in $25 cheaper on MSRP at $75 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Athlon X2 L310 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 33.0% better value on MSRP (23.2 vs 17.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X3 440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X3 440 vs Athlon X2 L310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X3 440

The Athlon II X3 440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,743 points. Launch price was $47.

AMD

Athlon X2 L310

The Athlon X2 L310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Conesus (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,747 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 440 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Athlon X2 L310 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X3 440 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 440 versus 1.2 GHz on the Athlon X2 L310 — a 85.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 440. The Athlon II X3 440 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X2 L310 uses Conesus (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 440 scores 1,743 against the Athlon X2 L310's 1,747 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon X2 L310.

FeatureAthlon II X3 440Athlon X2 L310
Cores / Threads
3 / 3+50%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+150%
1.2 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB+100%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Rana (2009−2011)
Conesus (2009)
PassMark
1,743
1,747
Geekbench 6 Single
120
Geekbench 6 Multi
213
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 440 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 L310 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 440 versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 L310 — the Athlon II X3 440 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 440 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 440) and Socket S1 (Athlon X2 L310).

FeatureAthlon II X3 440Athlon X2 L310
Socket
AM3
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+100%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+700%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X3 440) / Yes (Athlon X2 L310). Primary use case: Athlon X2 L310 targets Mobile.

FeatureAthlon II X3 440Athlon X2 L310
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X3 440 was priced at $75, while the Athlon X2 L310 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($75 vs $100), Athlon II X3 440 was $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 440 delivers 23.2 pts/$ vs 17.5 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 L310 — making the Athlon II X3 440 the 28.3% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X3 440Athlon X2 L310
MSRP
$75-25%
$100
Performance per Dollar
23.2+33%
17.5
Release Date
2010
2009

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.