A10-5745M vs Athlon II X3 440

A10-5745M vs Athlon II X3 440 Performance Spectrum

A10-5745M

4 / 4

1,767

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X3 440

3 / 3

1,743

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5745M vs Athlon II X3 440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5745M vs Athlon II X3 440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5745M

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 25W instead of 95W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8610G, while Athlon II X3 440 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon II X3 440

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,743 vs 1,767).
❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while A10-5745M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌280% higher power demand at 95W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5745M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5745M better than Athlon II X3 440?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X3 440 is ahead with a 0.0% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A10-5745M pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5745M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5745M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-5745M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. Athlon II X3 440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5745M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5745M vs Athlon II X3 440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5745M

The A10-5745M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,767 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II X3 440

The Athlon II X3 440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,743 points. Launch price was $47.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5745M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 440 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A10-5745M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the A10-5745M versus 3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 440 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 440 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10-5745M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X3 440 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5745M scores 1,767 against the Athlon II X3 440's 1,743 — a 1.4% lead for the A10-5745M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A10-5745M	Athlon II X3 440
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+33%	3 / 3
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark	1,767+1%	1,743

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5745M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 440 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X3 440 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5745M) vs 0 (Athlon II X3 440) — the A10-5745M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-5745M) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 440).

Feature	A10-5745M	Athlon II X3 440
Socket	FP2	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-5745M) / not specified (Athlon II X3 440). The A10-5745M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8610G), while the Athlon II X3 440 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5745M rivals Core i3-4010U.