A10-4657M vs Athlon II X3 440

A10-4657M vs Athlon II X3 440 Performance Spectrum

A10-4657M

4 / 4

1,759

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X3 440

3 / 3

1,743

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4657M vs Athlon II X3 440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4657M vs Athlon II X3 440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4657M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 95W, a 91W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660G, while Athlon II X3 440 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon II X3 440

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,743 vs 1,759).
❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while A10-4657M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2275% higher power demand at 95W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4657M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4657M better than Athlon II X3 440?

Yes. A10-4657M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.9% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-4657M has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 6.7% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-4657M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4657M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-4657M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% higher PassMark. Athlon II X3 440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4657M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4657M vs Athlon II X3 440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4657M

The A10-4657M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,759 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II X3 440

The Athlon II X3 440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,743 points. Launch price was $47.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4657M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 440 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A10-4657M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4657M versus 3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 440 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the A10-4657M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10-4657M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X3 440 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4657M scores 1,759 against the Athlon II X3 440's 1,743 — a 0.9% lead for the A10-4657M.

Feature	A10-4657M	Athlon II X3 440
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+33%	3 / 3
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark	1,759	1,743
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4657M uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 440 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-4657M versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 440 — the A10-4657M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4657M) vs 0 (Athlon II X3 440) — the A10-4657M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-4657M	Athlon II X3 440
Socket	BGA	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-4657M) / not specified (Athlon II X3 440). The A10-4657M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Athlon II X3 440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4657M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4657M rivals Core i3-2330M.