Athlon II X3 440 vs Turion X2 RM-74

Athlon II X3 440 vs Turion X2 RM-74 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X3 440

3 / 3

1,743

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion X2 RM-74

2 / 2

1,740

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 440 vs Turion X2 RM-74 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 440 vs Turion X2 RM-74: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 440

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Turion X2 RM-74 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.

Turion X2 RM-74

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,740 vs 1,743).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X3 440 better than Turion X2 RM-74?

Yes. Athlon II X3 440 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X3 440 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 21 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X3 440 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X3 440 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II X3 440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 3 cores / 3 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X3 440 vs Turion X2 RM-74 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 440

The Athlon II X3 440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,743 points. Launch price was $47.

Turion X2 RM-74

The Turion X2 RM-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,740 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 440 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Turion X2 RM-74 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X3 440 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 440 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-74 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 440. The Athlon II X3 440 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-74 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 440 scores 1,743 against the Turion X2 RM-74's 1,740 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X3 440. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon II X3 440	Turion X2 RM-74
Cores / Threads	3 / 3+50%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+36%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB+100%
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Rana (2009−2011)	Lion (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,743	1,740

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 440 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 RM-74 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.