
Athlon X2 L310

Pentium G2030
Athlon X2 L310 vs Pentium G2030 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X2 L310 vs Pentium G2030 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X2 L310 vs Pentium G2030: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X2 L310
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 55W, a 54W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (213 vs 826).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 20.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $85 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G2030 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Pentium G2030.
Pentium G2030
2013Why buy it
- ✅+287.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($85 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.8 vs 17.5 PassMark/$ ($85 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1), while Athlon X2 L310 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X2 L310 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌5400% higher power demand at 55W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G2030 better than Athlon X2 L310?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X2 L310 vs Pentium G2030 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 L310
The Athlon X2 L310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Conesus (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,747 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium G2030
The Pentium G2030 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,769 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon X2 L310 and Pentium G2030 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Athlon X2 L310 is built on the Conesus (2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon X2 L310 scores 1,747 against the Pentium G2030's 1,769 — a 1.3% lead for the Pentium G2030. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 120 vs 492, a 121.6% lead for the Pentium G2030 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 213 vs 826 (118% advantage for the Pentium G2030).
| Feature | Athlon X2 L310 | Pentium G2030 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | — |
| Process | 65 nm | 22 nm-66% |
| Architecture | Conesus (2009) | — |
| PassMark | 1,747 | 1,769+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 608 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 120 | 492+310% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 213 | 826+288% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X2 L310 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G2030 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 L310 versus DDR3-1600 on the Pentium G2030 — the Pentium G2030 supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G2030 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon X2 L310) vs 16 (Pentium G2030) — the Pentium G2030 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket S1 (Athlon X2 L310) and H61,B75,H77,Z77,Q77 (Pentium G2030).
| Feature | Athlon X2 L310 | Pentium G2030 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-1600+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 32 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: Yes (Athlon X2 L310) vs VT-x (Pentium G2030). The Pentium G2030 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)), while the Athlon X2 L310 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X2 L310 targets Mobile, Pentium G2030 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium G2030 rivals Core i3-2100.
| Feature | Athlon X2 L310 | Pentium G2030 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x |
| Target Use | Mobile | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X2 L310 was priced at $100, while the Pentium G2030 came in at $85. On launch pricing ($100 vs $85), Pentium G2030 was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 L310 delivers 17.5 pts/$ vs 20.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G2030 — making the Pentium G2030 the 17.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X2 L310 | Pentium G2030 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $85-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.5 | 20.8+19% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















