A6-9500E
VS
Core 2 Duo T5750

A6-9500E vs Core 2 Duo T5750

AMD

A6-9500E

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9500E is positioned at rank 609 and the Core 2 Duo T5750 is on rank 28, so the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9500E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10741%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10150%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7369%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2220%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1759%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1538%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
881%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
870%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
792%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
792%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
783%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
762%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
751%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
748%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
741%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
100%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
99%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
98%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
97%
#609
A6-9500E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
100%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
98%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
98%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
98%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
98%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5750

#16
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
169%
#17
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
166%
#18
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
153%
#19
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
152%
#20
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
151%
#22
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
145%
#23
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
139%
#24
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
139%
#25
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
136%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
100%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
99%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
98%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
98%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
98%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
96%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
89%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
88%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9500E (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-9500ECore 2 Duo T5750
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($8)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T5750 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-9500ECore 2 Duo T5750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($8)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9500E and Core 2 Duo T5750

AMD

A6-9500E

The A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,741 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the A6-9500E and Core 2 Duo T5750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A6-9500E versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — a 51.9% clock advantage for the A6-9500E (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-9500E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9500E scores 1,741 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-9500E. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-9500E vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750.

FeatureA6-9500ECore 2 Duo T5750
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+70%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1024 kB
2 MB+100%
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,741
1,738
Geekbench 6 Single
360
Geekbench 6 Multi
680
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9500E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500E versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — the A6-9500E supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9500E supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9500E) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T5750) — the A6-9500E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (A6-9500E) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750).

FeatureA6-9500ECore 2 Duo T5750
Socket
AM4
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+100%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+700%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9500E) / None (Core 2 Duo T5750). The A6-9500E includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop.

FeatureA6-9500ECore 2 Duo T5750
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Laptop