A6-9500E vs Core 2 Duo T5750

A6-9500E vs Core 2 Duo T5750 Performance Spectrum

A6-9500E

2 / 2

1,741

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T5750

2 / 2

1,738

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9500E vs Core 2 Duo T5750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9500E vs Core 2 Duo T5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9500E

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Core 2 Duo T5750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5750

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-9500E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,738 vs 1,741).
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9500E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-9500E better than Core 2 Duo T5750?

Yes. A6-9500E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-9500E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-9500E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-9500E still makes the most sense overall. A6-9500E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9500E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-9500E vs Core 2 Duo T5750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9500E

The A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,741 points. Launch price was $70.

Core 2 Duo T5750

The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9500E and Core 2 Duo T5750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A6-9500E versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — a 51.9% clock advantage for the A6-9500E (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-9500E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9500E scores 1,741 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-9500E. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-9500E vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750.

Feature	A6-9500E	Core 2 Duo T5750
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+70%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+50%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1024 kB	2 MB+100%
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,741	1,738
Geekbench 6 Single	—	360
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	680

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9500E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500E versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — the A6-9500E supports 259.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9500E supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9500E) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T5750) — the A6-9500E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (A6-9500E) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750).

Feature	A6-9500E	Core 2 Duo T5750
Socket	AM4	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+260%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9500E) / None (Core 2 Duo T5750). The A6-9500E includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop.