A6-9500E vs Xeon E5405

A6-9500E vs Xeon E5405 Performance Spectrum

A6-9500E

2 / 2

1,741

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5405

4 / 4

1,753

+0.7%

Celeron P4600

Celeron Dual-Core T3100

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9500E vs Xeon E5405 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9500E vs Xeon E5405: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9500E

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Xeon E5405 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,741 vs 1,753).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5405, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5405

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while A6-9500E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9500E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-9500E better than Xeon E5405?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5405 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A6-9500E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5405 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-9500E is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5405 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A6-9500E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $209 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5405 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. Xeon E5405 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9500E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-9500E vs Xeon E5405 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9500E

The A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,741 points. Launch price was $70.

Xeon E5405

The Xeon E5405 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,753 points. Launch price was $209.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-9500E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5405 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5405 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A6-9500E versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5405 — a 51.9% clock advantage for the A6-9500E (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-9500E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5405 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9500E scores 1,741 against the Xeon E5405's 1,753 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5405. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-9500E vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5405.

Feature	A6-9500E	Xeon E5405
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+70%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+50%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1024 kB	6 MB (total)+500%
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,741	1,753

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9500E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5405 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500E versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon E5405 — the A6-9500E supports 259.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9500E) vs 0 (Xeon E5405) — the A6-9500E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6-9500E	Xeon E5405
Socket	AM4	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+260%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9500E) / VT-x (Xeon E5405). The A6-9500E includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Xeon E5405 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5405 targets Server.