A6-9500E
VS
Core i5-520M

A6-9500E vs Core i5-520M

AMD

A6-9500E

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i5-520M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9500E is positioned at rank 609 and the Core i5-520M is on rank 1139, so the A6-9500E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9500E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10741%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10150%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7369%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2220%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1759%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1538%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
881%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
870%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
792%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
792%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
783%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
762%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
751%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
748%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
741%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
100%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
99%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
98%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
97%
#609
A6-9500E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
100%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
98%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
98%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
98%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
98%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-520M

#1127
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3820%
#1128
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3764%
#1129
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3456%
#1130
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3440%
#1131
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3409%
#1133
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3292%
#1134
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3156%
#1135
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3151%
#1136
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3066%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
99%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
98%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
96%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
96%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
95%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9500E (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-9500ECore i5-520M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-520M (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-9500ECore i5-520M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9500E and Core i5-520M

AMD

A6-9500E

The A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,741 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core i5-520M

The Core i5-520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The A6-9500E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-520M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A6-9500E versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-520M — a 14.8% clock advantage for the A6-9500E (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A6-9500E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-520M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9500E scores 1,741 against the Core i5-520M's 1,727 — a 0.8% lead for the A6-9500E. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-9500E vs 3 MB on the Core i5-520M.

FeatureA6-9500ECore i5-520M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+16%
2.93 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+25%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512 kB
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,741
1,727
Geekbench 6 Single
360
Geekbench 6 Multi
695
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9500E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-520M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500E versus 1066 on the Core i5-520M — the Core i5-520M supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9500E supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9500E) vs 16 (Core i5-520M) — the Core i5-520M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (A6-9500E) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-520M).

FeatureA6-9500ECore i5-520M
Socket
AM4
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
1066+26550%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+419430300%
8
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9500E) / true (Core i5-520M). Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9500E) and Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i5-520M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-520M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.

FeatureA6-9500ECore i5-520M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true