Core 2 Duo T5750
VS
Core i5-520M

Core 2 Duo T5750 vs Core i5-520M

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i5-520M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T5750 is positioned at rank 28 and the Core i5-520M is on rank 1139, so the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5750

#16
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
169%
#17
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
166%
#18
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
153%
#19
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
152%
#20
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
151%
#22
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
145%
#23
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
139%
#24
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
139%
#25
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
136%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
100%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
99%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
98%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
98%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
98%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
96%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
89%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
88%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-520M

#1127
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3820%
#1128
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3764%
#1129
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3456%
#1130
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3440%
#1131
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3409%
#1133
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3292%
#1134
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3156%
#1135
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3151%
#1136
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3066%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
99%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
98%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
96%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
96%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
95%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core 2 Duo T5750 shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightCore 2 Duo T5750Core i5-520M
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($8)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Duo T5750 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 96% cheaper ($8 vs $225) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 2 Duo T5750Core i5-520M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2730%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($8)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T5750 and Core i5-520M

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core i5-520M

The Core i5-520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T5750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-520M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-520M — a 37.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-520M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T5750 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-520M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5750 scores 1,738 against the Core i5-520M's 1,727 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 360 vs 360, a 0% lead for the Core i5-520M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 680 vs 695 (2.2% advantage for the Core i5-520M). L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-520M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750Core i5-520M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.93 GHz+47%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,738
1,727
Geekbench 6 Single
360
360
Geekbench 6 Multi
680
695+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T5750 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-520M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T5750 versus 1066 on the Core i5-520M — the Core i5-520M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-520M supports up to 8 of RAM compared to 4 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo T5750) vs 16 (Core i5-520M) — the Core i5-520M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-520M).

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750Core i5-520M
Socket
PGA478
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
1066+53200%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB+52428700%
8
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Core 2 Duo T5750) vs true (Core i5-520M). The Core i5-520M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-520M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5750Core i5-520M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
true
Target Use
Legacy Laptop