Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
VS
Core i5-540M

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 vs Core i5-540M

AMD

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i5-540M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is positioned at rank 347 and the Core i5-540M is on rank 432, so the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
99%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#335
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
495%
#336
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
488%
#337
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
448%
#338
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
446%
#339
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
442%
#341
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
427%
#342
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
409%
#343
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
409%
#344
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
398%
#347
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-540M

#419
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
572%
#420
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
563%
#421
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
517%
#422
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
515%
#423
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
510%
#425
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
493%
#426
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
472%
#427
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
472%
#428
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
459%
#432
Core i5-540M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-540M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightTurion X2 Ultra ZM-82Core i5-540M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion X2 Ultra ZM-82Core i5-540M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Core i5-540M

AMD

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,777 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-540M

The Core i5-540M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $257.

Processing Power

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-540M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 versus 3.07 GHz on the Core i5-540M — a 33% clock advantage for the Core i5-540M. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 uses the Puma (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-540M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 scores 1,777 against the Core i5-540M's 1,796 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-540M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-540M.

FeatureTurion X2 Ultra ZM-82Core i5-540M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.07 GHz+40%
Base Clock
2.53 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Puma (2008−2009)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,777
1,796+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
300
Geekbench 6 Multi
700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-540M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion X2 Ultra ZM-82Core i5-540M
Socket
S1g2
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-540M). The Core i5-540M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-540M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-540M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.

FeatureTurion X2 Ultra ZM-82Core i5-540M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop