Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
VS
Core i5-2515E

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 vs Core i5-2515E

AMD

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i5-2515E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is positioned at rank #319 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#307
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
467%
#308
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
460%
#309
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
422%
#310
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
420%
#311
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
416%
#313
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
402%
#314
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
386%
#315
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
385%
#316
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
375%
#319
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-2515E leads in gaming performance. However, the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightTurion X2 Ultra ZM-84Core i5-2515E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion X2 Ultra ZM-84Core i5-2515E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Core i5-2515E

AMD

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-2515E

The Core i5-2515E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,882 points. Launch price was $266.

Processing Power

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-2515E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core i5-2515E — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-2515E. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 uses the Puma (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-2515E uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 scores 1,886 against the Core i5-2515E's 1,882 — a 0.2% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2515E.

FeatureTurion X2 Ultra ZM-84Core i5-2515E
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Puma (2008−2009)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,886
1,882
Geekbench 6 Single
530
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2515E uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion X2 Ultra ZM-84Core i5-2515E
Socket
S1g2
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2515E). The Core i5-2515E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2515E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-2515E rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeatureTurion X2 Ultra ZM-84Core i5-2515E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded