
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 vs Core M-5Y70

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

Core M-5Y70
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is positioned at rank 319 and the Core M-5Y70 is on rank 1171, so the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y70
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Core M-5Y70

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $69.

Core M-5Y70
The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core M-5Y70's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y70. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 uses the Puma (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core M-5Y70 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 scores 1,886 against the Core M-5Y70's 1,890 — a 0.2% lead for the Core M-5Y70. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y70.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Puma (2008−2009) | Broadwell-Y (2014) |
| PassMark | 1,886 | 1,890 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y70 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g2 | FCBGA1234 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















