UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
VS
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Intel

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

2022Boost: 1400 MHz
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

2020Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.

InsightUHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Performance
Leading raw performance (+4.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%)
Longevity
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $20 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 4.2% better value per dollar than the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.

InsightUHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+4.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Intel

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1400 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.

Graphics Performance

The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) scores 2,500 and the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs reaches 2,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is built on Gen. 12 while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on a 10 nm process. Shader units: 64 (UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Boost clocks: 1400 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureUHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
G3D Mark Score
2,500+4%
2,400
Architecture
Gen. 12
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
10 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
64+33%
48
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
1450 MHz+4%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureUHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureUHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) draws 15W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W — a 60.5% difference. The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureUHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
TDP
15W-46%
28W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
166.7+95%
85.7
💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 125.0 (UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)) vs 120.0 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) — the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) offers 4.2% better value. The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).

FeatureUHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$20
Performance per Dollar
125.0+4%
120.0
Codename
Alder Lake Xe
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
January 4 2022
August 15 2020
Ranking
#599
#712