CPU
GPU
FireStream 9370
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FireStream 9370 is positioned at rank #246 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FireStream 9370 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FireStream 9370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen).
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $50 for the FireStream 9370, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 147.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+147.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9370 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1400 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) reaches 2,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) uses Gen. 12, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 64 (UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,528+1% | 2,500 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+2400% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) has 0 MB. The FireStream 9370 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)'s 15W — a 175% difference. The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2 | 166.7+1388% |
Value Analysis
The FireStream 9370 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) launched at $0 and now averages $20. The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.6 (FireStream 9370) vs 125.0 (UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)) — the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) offers 147% better value. The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $20-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.6 | 125.0+147% |
| Codename | Cypress | Alder Lake Xe |
| Release | June 23 2010 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #631 | #599 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9370 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
