
FireStream 9370

Radeon Pro WX 3100
FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9370
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌302% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 13.0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.
- ❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.
Radeon Pro WX 3100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 310.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

Radeon Pro WX 3100
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the Radeon Pro WX 3100 reaches 2,584 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,528 | 2,584+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+213% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.64 TFLOPS+112% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9370 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3100.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_0)+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3100's 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 65W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2 | 39.8+255% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9370 came in at $800, while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 3100 was 75.1% cheaper ($601 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 13.0 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) — the Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers 306.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3100 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $199-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 13.0+306% |
| Codename | Cypress | Lexa |
| Release | June 23 2010 | June 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #631 | #624 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














