CPU
GPU
FireStream 9370
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FireStream 9370 is positioned at rank 246 and the Radeon Pro WX 3100 is on rank 113, so the Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro WX 3100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FireStream 9370 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FireStream 9370.
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FireStream 9370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FireStream 9370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $65), it costs 23% less, resulting in a 27.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+27.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3100
FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.
Radeon Pro WX 3100
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the Radeon Pro WX 3100 reaches 2,584 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,528 | 2,584+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+213% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.64 TFLOPS+112% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_0)+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3100's 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 65W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2 | 39.8+255% |
Value Analysis
The FireStream 9370 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 launched at $199 and now averages $65. The FireStream 9370 costs 23.1% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.6 (FireStream 9370) vs 39.8 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) — the FireStream 9370 offers 27.1% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $199-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-23% | $65 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.6+27% | 39.8 |
| Codename | Cypress | Lexa |
| Release | June 23 2010 | June 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #631 | #624 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3100
