FireStream 9370 vs GRID M3-3020

CPU

GPU

FireStream 9370

2010Core: 825 MHz

GRID M3-3020

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FireStream 9370

225

2,528

+1.1%

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

Radeon RX 7400

Radeon RX 7800M

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

GRID M3-3020

250

2,500

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FireStream 9370 is positioned at rank 246 and the GRID M3-3020 is on rank 265, so the FireStream 9370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370

#103

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999

93%

#104

Radeon Pro W6900X

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000

92%

#105

Quadro RTX 6000

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800

90%

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

84%

#231

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

4675%

#246

FireStream 9370

MSRP: $800|Avg: $50

100%

#247

GRID K260Q

MSRP: $937|Avg: $15

100%

#249

Quadro 600

MSRP: $179|Avg: $20

92%

#251

Quadro 410

MSRP: $149|Avg: $25

91%

#253

FirePro W600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $30

90%

#254

FirePro W8100

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200

86%

#255

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500

86%

#256

Quadro K5200

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70

86%

#257

Quadro K2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

84%

#258

FirePro V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $96

84%

#260

FirePro W8000

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

84%

#261

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M3-3020

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

94%

#109

Quadro M6000 24GB

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600

93%

#249

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5909%

#264

GRID M40

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

100%

#265

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

100%

#266

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

100%

#267

FirePro V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

100%

#268

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

99%

#269

FirePro 3D V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $40

98%

#270

FirePro S9050

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825

98%

#271

FirePro R5000

MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150

96%

#272

GRID M6-8Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

95%

#275

GRID K120Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $20

94%

#276

Tesla M60

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250

93%

#278

FirePro V7900

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

90%

#279

GRID P6-4Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GRID M3-3020 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GRID M3-3020 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FireStream 9370 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FireStream 9370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M3-3020.

Insight	FireStream 9370	GRID M3-3020
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The FireStream 9370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FireStream 9370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FireStream 9370	GRID M3-3020
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FireStream 9370 Benchmark Check

GRID M3-3020 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9370 and GRID M3-3020

FireStream 9370

The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

GRID M3-3020

The GRID M3-3020 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the GRID M3-3020 reaches 2,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M3-3020 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 640 (GRID M3-3020). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M3-3020).

Feature	FireStream 9370	GRID M3-3020
G3D Mark Score	2,528+1%	2,500
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1600+150%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.64 TFLOPS+58%	1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L1 Cache	160 KB	320 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FireStream 9370	GRID M3-3020
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M3-3020 has 2 GB. The FireStream 9370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FireStream 9370) vs 2 MB (GRID M3-3020) — the GRID M3-3020 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FireStream 9370	GRID M3-3020
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the GRID M3-3020's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The FireStream 9370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 350W (GRID M3-3020). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FireStream 9370	GRID M3-3020
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.2+12%	10.0

💰

Value Analysis

The FireStream 9370 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID M3-3020 launched at $1000 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.6 (FireStream 9370) vs 50.0 (GRID M3-3020) — the FireStream 9370 offers 1.2% better value. The GRID M3-3020 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).