
FireStream 9370
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FireStream 9370 is positioned at rank #246 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FireStream 9370 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (275mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FireStream 9370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FireStream 9370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 95% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9370 and Radeon HD 6950

FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

Radeon HD 6950
The Radeon HD 6950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,593 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the Radeon HD 6950 reaches 2,593 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6950 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6950). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6950).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,528 | 2,593+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+14% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.64 TFLOPS+17% | 2.253 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 88+10% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 352 KB+120% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6950 has 1 GB. The FireStream 9370 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 11_2 (Radeon HD 6950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+2% | 11_2 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6950). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6950's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon HD 6950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 200W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2 | 13.0+16% |
Value Analysis
The FireStream 9370 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 6950 launched at $299 and now averages $100. The FireStream 9370 costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.6 (FireStream 9370) vs 25.9 (Radeon HD 6950) — the FireStream 9370 offers 95.4% better value.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $299-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-50% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.6+95% | 25.9 |
| Codename | Cypress | Cayman |
| Release | June 23 2010 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #631 | #623 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














