Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 6950

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FireStream 9370

2010Core: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6950

2010Boost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 6950 Performance Spectrum

FireStream 9370
4 GB 225
2,528
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 4870
brand logoRadeon R7 M380
brand logoRadeon HD 5850
brand logoRadeon HD 6870
brand logoRadeon RX 470 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Radeon HD 6950
1 GB 200
2,593
+2.6%
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon HD 5830
brand logoRadeon R9 350
brand logoRadeon HD 5970
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 6950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9370

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    167.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $800 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 8.7 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6950

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $501 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 174.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.7 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6950 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (2,593 vs 2,528), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FireStream 9370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6950 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $501 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $800, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 174.4% (8.7 vs 3.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6950 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FireStream 9370 has the stronger long-term case.

FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 6950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9370

The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6950

The Radeon HD 6950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,593 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the Radeon HD 6950 reaches 2,593 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6950 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6950). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6950).

FeatureFireStream 9370Radeon HD 6950
G3D Mark Score
2,528
2,593+3%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 3
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1600+14%
1408
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.64 TFLOPS+17%
2.253 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
88+10%
L1 Cache
160 KB
352 KB+120%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFireStream 9370Radeon HD 6950
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9370 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6950 carries 1 GB. FireStream 9370 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9370 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6950.

FeatureFireStream 9370Radeon HD 6950
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+300%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 11_2 (Radeon HD 6950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureFireStream 9370Radeon HD 6950
DirectX
11.2+2%
11_2
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6950). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 3.

FeatureFireStream 9370Radeon HD 6950
Encoder
None
UVD 3
Decoder
UVD 2.2
UVD 3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6950's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon HD 6950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFireStream 9370Radeon HD 6950
TDP
225W
200W-11%
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
267mm
275mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
—
Perf/Watt
11.2
13.0+16%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9370 came in at $800, while the Radeon HD 6950 launched at $299. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6950 was 62.6% cheaper ($501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 8.7 (Radeon HD 6950) — the Radeon HD 6950 offers 171.9% better value.

FeatureFireStream 9370Radeon HD 6950
MSRP
$800
$299-63%
Performance per Dollar
3.2
8.7+172%
Codename
Cypress
Cayman
Release
June 23 2010
December 14 2010
Ranking
#631
#623
Search FireStream 9370 on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 6950 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.