
FireStream 9370
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6850 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FireStream 9370 is positioned at rank #246 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6850 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FireStream 9370 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6850 X2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6850 X2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9370 and Radeon HD 6850 X2

FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

Radeon HD 6850 X2
The Radeon HD 6850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,534 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the Radeon HD 6850 X2 reaches 2,534 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6850 X2 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,528 | 2,534 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+67% | 960 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.64 TFLOPS+72% | 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6850 X2 has 2 GB. The FireStream 9370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 2.2.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 2.2 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6850 X2's 254W — a 12.1% difference. The FireStream 9370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 600W (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-11% | 254W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2+12% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
The FireStream 9370 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 6850 X2 launched at $350 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.6 (FireStream 9370) vs 50.7 (Radeon HD 6850 X2) — the Radeon HD 6850 X2 offers 0.2% better value. The Radeon HD 6850 X2 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $350-56% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.6 | 50.7 |
| Codename | Cypress | Barts |
| Release | June 23 2010 | September 19 2011 |
| Ranking | #631 | #630 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













