G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9370 vs Moore Threads MTT S80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FireStream 9370 vs Moore Threads MTT S80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9370

2010

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
207.7% HIGHER MSRP
$800 MSRPvs$260 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).

Moore Threads MTT S80

Why buy it

✅Costs $540 less on MSRP ($260 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
✅Delivers 205.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($260 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
✅FireStream 9370 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Moore Threads MTT S80 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FireStream 9370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (2,528 vs 2,513), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Moore Threads MTT S80 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 40nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Moore Threads MTT S80 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $540 cheaper on MSRP at $260 vs $800, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 205.9% (9.7 vs 3.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. FireStream 9370 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FireStream 9370 vs Moore Threads MTT S80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9370

The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

Moore Threads MTT S80

The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the Moore Threads MTT S80 reaches 2,513 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Moore Threads MTT S80 uses MUSA, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80).

Feature	FireStream 9370	Moore Threads MTT S80
G3D Mark Score	2,528	2,513
Architecture	TeraScale 2	MUSA
Process Node	40 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1600	4096+156%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.64 TFLOPS	14.75 TFLOPS+459%
ROPs	32	256+700%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FireStream 9370	Moore Threads MTT S80
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9370 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 carries 2 GB. FireStream 9370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9370 and 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S80. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FireStream 9370) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FireStream 9370	Moore Threads MTT S80
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	FireStream 9370	Moore Threads MTT S80
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80).

Feature	FireStream 9370	Moore Threads MTT S80
Encoder	None	MUSA Gen2
Decoder	UVD 2.2	MUSA Gen2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 255W — a 12.5% difference. The FireStream 9370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	FireStream 9370	Moore Threads MTT S80
TDP	225W-12%	255W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 8-pin
Length	267mm	285mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.2+13%	9.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9370 came in at $800, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260. On MSRP, Moore Threads MTT S80 was 67.5% cheaper ($540 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 9.7 (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 offers 203.1% better value.

Feature	FireStream 9370	Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP	$800	$260-68%
Performance per Dollar	3.2	9.7+203%
Codename	Cypress	Chunxiao
Release	June 23 2010	sem dados
Ranking	#631	#635

Search FireStream 9370 on Amazon

Search Moore Threads MTT S80 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.