CPU
GPU
FireStream 9370
Popular choices:
Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FireStream 9370 is positioned at rank #246 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S80
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FireStream 9370 is significantly newer (2010 vs 0). The FireStream 9370 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FireStream 9370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S80.
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | MUSA (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FireStream 9370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $170 for the Moore Threads MTT S80, it costs 71% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 242% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+242%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9370 and Moore Threads MTT S80
FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the Moore Threads MTT S80 reaches 2,513 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Moore Threads MTT S80 uses MUSA, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,528 | 2,513 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | MUSA |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600 | 4096+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.64 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+459% |
| ROPs | 32 | 256+700% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 has 2 GB. The FireStream 9370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FireStream 9370) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 255W — a 12.5% difference. The FireStream 9370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-12% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2+13% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
The FireStream 9370 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260 and now averages $170. The FireStream 9370 costs 70.6% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.6 (FireStream 9370) vs 14.8 (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the FireStream 9370 offers 241.9% better value.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $260-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-71% | $170 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.6+242% | 14.8 |
| Codename | Cypress | Chunxiao |
| Release | June 23 2010 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #631 | #635 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9370 and Moore Threads MTT S80
