
FireStream 9370

GRID M10-8Q
FireStream 9370 vs GRID M10-8Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9370 vs GRID M10-8Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FireStream 9370 vs GRID M10-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9370
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 204.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID M10-8Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌212.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9370 vs GRID M10-8Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

GRID M10-8Q
The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the GRID M10-8Q reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M10-8Q uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 640 (GRID M10-8Q). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,528 | 2,595+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+150% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.64 TFLOPS+58% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9370 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-8Q carries 2 GB. FireStream 9370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9370 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-8Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FireStream 9370) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) — the GRID M10-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_1)+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs NVDEC (2nd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID M10-8Q).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (4th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | NVDEC (2nd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the GRID M10-8Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID M10-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 350W (GRID M10-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2 | 11.5+3% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9370 came in at $800, while the GRID M10-8Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, FireStream 9370 was 68% cheaper ($1700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 1.0 (GRID M10-8Q) — the FireStream 9370 offers 220% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-8Q (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800-68% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2+220% | 1.0 |
| Codename | Cypress | GM107 |
| Release | June 23 2010 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #631 | #622 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














