FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 850M

CPU

GPU

FireStream 9370

2010Core: 825 MHz

GeForce GTX 850M

2014Core: Up to 936 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FireStream 9370

225

2,528

0.0%

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

Radeon RX 7400

Radeon RX 7800M

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

GeForce GTX 850M

2,537

+0.4%

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FireStream 9370 is positioned at rank 246 and the GeForce GTX 850M is on rank 68, so the GeForce GTX 850M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370

#103

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999

93%

#104

Radeon Pro W6900X

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000

92%

#105

Quadro RTX 6000

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800

90%

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

84%

#231

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

4675%

#246

FireStream 9370

MSRP: $800|Avg: $50

100%

#247

GRID K260Q

MSRP: $937|Avg: $15

100%

#249

Quadro 600

MSRP: $179|Avg: $20

92%

#251

Quadro 410

MSRP: $149|Avg: $25

91%

#253

FirePro W600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $30

90%

#254

FirePro W8100

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200

86%

#255

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500

86%

#256

Quadro K5200

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70

86%

#257

Quadro K2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

84%

#258

FirePro V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $96

84%

#260

FirePro W8000

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

84%

#261

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 850M

#22

Radeon RX 7700

MSRP: $449|Avg: $399

97%

#58

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

214%

#60

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

194%

#61

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

193%

#65

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

176%

#66

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

175%

#68

GeForce GTX 850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

100%

#78

Radeon HD 8970M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170

95%

#82

Arc 7-Core iGPU

MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 850M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FireStream 9370 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	FireStream 9370	GeForce GTX 850M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 850M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 850M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 25.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FireStream 9370	GeForce GTX 850M
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+25.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FireStream 9370 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 850M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M

FireStream 9370

The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

GeForce GTX 850M

The GeForce GTX 850M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 936 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,537 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the GeForce GTX 850M reaches 2,537 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 850M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 850M). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 1.155 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 850M).

Feature	FireStream 9370	GeForce GTX 850M
G3D Mark Score	2,528	2,537
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1600+150%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.64 TFLOPS+129%	1.155 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L1 Cache	160 KB	320 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FireStream 9370	GeForce GTX 850M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 850M has 2 GB. The FireStream 9370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FireStream 9370) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 850M) — the GeForce GTX 850M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FireStream 9370	GeForce GTX 850M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 850M). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

Feature	FireStream 9370	GeForce GTX 850M
DirectX	11.2+2%	11.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.5+2%
Max Displays	1	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 850M). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 850M).

Feature	FireStream 9370	GeForce GTX 850M
Encoder	None	NVENC 2.0
Decoder	UVD 2.2	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 850M's 45W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 850M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	FireStream 9370	GeForce GTX 850M
TDP	225W	45W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	11.2	56.4+404%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 850M costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.6 (FireStream 9370) vs 63.4 (GeForce GTX 850M) — the GeForce GTX 850M offers 25.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 850M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).