Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FireStream 9370

2010Core: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

2012Core: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Performance Spectrum

FireStream 9370
4 GB 225
2,528
+0.1%
brand logoRadeon HD 4870
brand logoRadeon R7 M380
brand logoRadeon HD 5850
brand logoRadeon HD 6870
brand logoRadeon RX 470 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
2 GB 110
2,525
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 460M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 480M
brand logoGeForce GTX 470M
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
brand logoRTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9370

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    436.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $800 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌104.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 110W.
  • ❌84.1% longer card at 267mm vs 145mm.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $651 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 436.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 110W instead of 225W, a 115W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 145mm instead of 267mm, a 122mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FireStream 9370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (2,528 vs 2,525), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FireStream 9370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 650 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $651 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $800, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 436.3% (16.9 vs 3.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 650 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FireStream 9370 has the stronger long-term case.

FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9370

The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti reaches 2,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti).

FeatureFireStream 9370GeForce GTX 650 Ti
G3D Mark Score
2,528
2,525
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1600+108%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.64 TFLOPS+85%
1.425 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+25%
64
L1 Cache
160 KB+150%
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FireStream 9370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFireStream 9370GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9370 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti carries 2 GB. FireStream 9370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9370 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FireStream 9370) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) — the FireStream 9370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFireStream 9370GeForce GTX 650 Ti
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureFireStream 9370GeForce GTX 650 Ti
DirectX
11.2+2%
11.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9370) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti).

FeatureFireStream 9370GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Encoder
None
NVENC (1st Gen)
Decoder
UVD 2.2
PureVideo VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti's 110W — a 68.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.

FeatureFireStream 9370GeForce GTX 650 Ti
TDP
225W
110W-51%
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
267mm
145mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
70-13%
Perf/Watt
11.2
23.0+105%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9370 came in at $800, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 Ti was 81.4% cheaper ($651 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 16.9 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers 428.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 650 Ti (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureFireStream 9370GeForce GTX 650 Ti
MSRP
$800
$149-81%
Performance per Dollar
3.2
16.9+428%
Codename
Cypress
GK106
Release
June 23 2010
October 9 2012
Ranking
#631
#633
Search FireStream 9370 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 650 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.