CPU
GPU
FireStream 9370
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 950M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FireStream 9370 is positioned at rank 246 and the GeForce GTX 950M is on rank 83, so the GeForce GTX 950M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 950M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 950M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FireStream 9370 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 950M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 950M
FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.
GeForce GTX 950M
The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the GeForce GTX 950M reaches 2,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 950M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950M). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,528 | 2,575+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600+150% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.64 TFLOPS+83% | 1.439 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950M has 2 GB. The FireStream 9370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FireStream 9370) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) — the GeForce GTX 950M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 950M's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2 | 34.3+206% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Codename | Cypress | GM107 |
| Release | June 23 2010 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #631 | #626 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 950M
