FireStream 9370 vs GRID M40

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9370 vs GRID M40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FireStream 9370 vs GRID M40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9370

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

GRID M40

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
25% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FireStream 9370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (2,528 vs 2,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FireStream 9370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FireStream 9370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $800 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 26.4% (3.2 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FireStream 9370 vs GRID M40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9370

The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

GRID M40

The GRID M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FireStream 9370 scores 2,528 and the GRID M40 reaches 2,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9370 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M40 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (FireStream 9370) vs 384 (GRID M40). Raw compute: 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370) vs 0.7933 TFLOPS (GRID M40).

Feature	FireStream 9370	GRID M40
G3D Mark Score	2,528+1%	2,500
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1600+317%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.64 TFLOPS+233%	0.7933 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L1 Cache	160 KB	192 KB+20%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FireStream 9370	GRID M40
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9370 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M40 carries 2 GB. FireStream 9370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9370 and 64-bit on the GRID M40. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FireStream 9370) vs 2 MB (GRID M40) — the GRID M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FireStream 9370	GRID M40
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9370 draws 225W versus the GRID M40's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The GRID M40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9370) vs 350W (GRID M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FireStream 9370	GRID M40
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.2	50.0+346%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9370 came in at $800, while the GRID M40 launched at $1000. On MSRP, FireStream 9370 was 20% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (FireStream 9370) vs 2.5 (GRID M40) — the FireStream 9370 offers 28% better value. The newer card here is GRID M40 (2016 vs 2010).

Feature	FireStream 9370	GRID M40
MSRP	$800-20%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	3.2+28%	2.5
Codename	Cypress	GM107
Release	June 23 2010	May 18 2016
Ranking	#631	#742

Search FireStream 9370 on Amazon

Search GRID M40 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.