CPU
GPU
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Popular choices:
RTXA5000-6Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-6Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTXA5000-6Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H).
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTXA5000-6Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and RTXA5000-6Q
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
RTXA5000-6Q
The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) scores 1,500 and the RTXA5000-6Q reaches 1,522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is built on Gen. 12 while the RTXA5000-6Q uses Ampere, both on 10 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,500 | 1,522+1% |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 32 | 8192+25500% |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | 1695 MHz+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-6Q has 512 MB. The RTXA5000-6Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) draws 15W versus the RTXA5000-6Q's 230W — a 175.5% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 350W (RTXA5000-6Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+1415% | 6.6 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500 and now averages $2500. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($2500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) vs 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) — the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.6 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GA102 |
| Release | May 11 2021 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #709 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and RTXA5000-6Q
