UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs GRID M3-3020
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Popular choices:
GRID M3-3020
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M3-3020
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M3-3020 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M3-3020 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | GRID M3-3020 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $50 for the GRID M3-3020, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 140% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | GRID M3-3020 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+140%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and GRID M3-3020
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.
GRID M3-3020
The GRID M3-3020 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs scores 2,400 and the GRID M3-3020 reaches 2,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GRID M3-3020 uses Maxwell, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) vs 640 (GRID M3-3020). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | GRID M3-3020 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,400 | 2,500+4% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 48 | 640+1233% |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz+11% | 1306 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | GRID M3-3020 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M3-3020 has 2 GB. The GRID M3-3020 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | GRID M3-3020 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs draws 28W versus the GRID M3-3020's 250W — a 159.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) vs 350W (GRID M3-3020). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | GRID M3-3020 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 28W-89% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 85.7+757% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GRID M3-3020 launched at $1000 and now averages $50. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 120.0 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) vs 50.0 (GRID M3-3020) — the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers 140% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | GRID M3-3020 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.0+140% | 50.0 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GM107 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #712 | #587 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and GRID M3-3020
