VIA Nano U2250 vs Athlon 64 2800+
VIA Nano U2250
Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The VIA Nano U2250 is positioned at rank 1119 and the Athlon 64 2800+ is on rank 1098, so the Athlon 64 2800+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano U2250
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | VIA Nano U2250 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Isaiah (2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (NewCastle (2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | VIA Nano U2250 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+52%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of VIA Nano U2250 and Athlon 64 2800+
VIA Nano U2250
The VIA Nano U2250 is manufactured by VIA. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Isaiah (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon 64 2800+
The Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $100.
Processing Power
Both the VIA Nano U2250 and Athlon 64 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the VIA Nano U2250 versus 1.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 2800+ — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 2800+. The VIA Nano U2250 uses the Isaiah (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon 64 2800+ uses NewCastle (2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the VIA Nano U2250 scores 425 against the Athlon 64 2800+'s 420 — a 1.2% lead for the VIA Nano U2250.
| Feature | VIA Nano U2250 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 65 nm-50% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Isaiah (2009) | NewCastle (2004) |
| PassMark | 425+1% | 420 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 150 | — |
Memory & Platform
The VIA Nano U2250 uses the NanoBGA2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 2800+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the VIA Nano U2250 versus DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 2800+ — the VIA Nano U2250 supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 1 (VIA Nano U2250) vs 0 (Athlon 64 2800+) — the VIA Nano U2250 offers 1 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: VX900 (VIA Nano U2250) and AMD 754 (Athlon 64 2800+).
| Feature | VIA Nano U2250 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | NanoBGA2 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 1 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (VIA Nano U2250) / not specified (Athlon 64 2800+). Primary use case: VIA Nano U2250 targets Embedded.
| Feature | VIA Nano U2250 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Value Analysis
The VIA Nano U2250 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 2800+ debuted at $178. At current prices ($10 vs $15), the VIA Nano U2250 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the VIA Nano U2250 delivers 42.5 pts/$ vs 28.0 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 2800+ — making the VIA Nano U2250 the 41.1% better value option.
| Feature | VIA Nano U2250 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-72% | $178 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.5+52% | 28.0 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2004 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on VIA Nano U2250 and Athlon 64 2800+
