
VIA Nano U2250 vs Core i5-13600K

VIA Nano U2250

Core i5-13600K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The VIA Nano U2250 is positioned at rank #1119 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano U2250
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | VIA Nano U2250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Isaiah (2009) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | VIA Nano U2250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+178%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of VIA Nano U2250 and Core i5-13600K
VIA Nano U2250
The VIA Nano U2250 is manufactured by VIA. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Isaiah (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The VIA Nano U2250 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 13 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the VIA Nano U2250 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 109.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K. The VIA Nano U2250 uses the Isaiah (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the VIA Nano U2250 scores 425 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 195.5% lead for the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | VIA Nano U2250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 14 / 20+1300% |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+240% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 24 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | Intel 7 nm-89% |
| Architecture | Isaiah (2009) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 425 | 37,655+8760% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 150 | — |
Memory & Platform
The VIA Nano U2250 uses the NanoBGA2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13600K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the VIA Nano U2250 versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K — the Core i5-13600K supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (VIA Nano U2250) vs 2 (Core i5-13600K). PCIe lanes: 1 (VIA Nano U2250) vs 20 (Core i5-13600K) — the Core i5-13600K offers 19 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: VX900 (VIA Nano U2250) and Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K).
| Feature | VIA Nano U2250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | NanoBGA2 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR5-5600+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 192 GB+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 1 | 20+1900% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (VIA Nano U2250) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the VIA Nano U2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: VIA Nano U2250 targets Embedded, Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | VIA Nano U2250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Embedded | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The VIA Nano U2250 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Core i5-13600K debuted at $329. At current prices ($10 vs $319), the VIA Nano U2250 is $309 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the VIA Nano U2250 delivers 42.5 pts/$ vs 118.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-13600K — making the Core i5-13600K the 94.1% better value option.
| Feature | VIA Nano U2250 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-85% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-97% | $319 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.5 | 118.0+178% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















