Xeon 3.06
VS
Athlon 64 3400+

Xeon 3.06 vs Athlon 64 3400+

Intel

Xeon 3.06

1 Cores1 Thrd97 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2003
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 3400+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon 3.06 is positioned at rank 1015 and the Athlon 64 3400+ is on rank 1116, so the Xeon 3.06 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 3.06

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
77546%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
14641%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
13008%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
10049%
#541
Xeon E5-4669 v4
MSRP: $7007|Avg: $300
93%
#1015
Xeon 3.06
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1016
Xeon E5-4640
MSRP: $2725|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Xeon E5-4650
MSRP: $3616|Avg: $71
89%
#1019
Xeon E5-4650L
MSRP: $3616|Avg: N/A
88%
#1020
Xeon E5-4655 v4
MSRP: $4616|Avg: N/A
88%
#1021
Xeon E-2224
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $195
83%
#1022
Athlon MP 2400+
MSRP: $151|Avg: $20
75%
#1023
Xeon E5-2650L v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $1078
69%
#1024
Xeon E5-2640 v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $530
69%
#1025
Opteron 142
MSRP: $292|Avg: $20
57%
#1026
Athlon MP 2800+
MSRP: $275|Avg: $10
51%
#1027
Xeon L3110
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $950
50%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
49%
#1029
Xeon X5272
MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76
46%
#1030
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
25%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3400+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
251383%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
237532%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
172468%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
51957%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
41156%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
36003%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
20621%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
20352%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
18531%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
18529%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
18322%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
17827%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
17578%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
17507%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
17348%
#1116
Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: $440|Avg: $20
100%
#1117
Pentium 4 2.26
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
98%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
98%
#1119
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
94%
#1120
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
94%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
94%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
90%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
89%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
83%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
81%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
79%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
77%
#1128
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
73%
#1129
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
73%
#1130
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
73%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 3.06 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon 3.06Athlon 64 3400+
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Gallatin (2003−2004) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 3400+ ($20), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($20 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon 3.06Athlon 64 3400+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 3.06 and Athlon 64 3400+

Intel

Xeon 3.06

The Xeon 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Athlon 64 3400+

The Athlon 64 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon 3.06 and Athlon 64 3400+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.07 GHz on the Xeon 3.06 versus 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3400+ — a 24.5% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.06. The Xeon 3.06 uses the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon 64 3400+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 3.06 scores 535 against the Athlon 64 3400+'s 545 — a 1.9% lead for the Athlon 64 3400+. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Xeon 3.06 vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 3400+.

FeatureXeon 3.06Athlon 64 3400+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
3.07 GHz+28%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512K
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
Gallatin (2003−2004)
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
PassMark
535
545+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 3.06 uses the PGA604 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 3400+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon 3.06Athlon 64 3400+
Socket
PGA604
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0