Xeon 5150 vs Xeon E5335

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 5150 vs Xeon E5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 5150 vs Xeon E5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 5150

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5335

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,549 vs 1,555).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 5150 better than Xeon E5335?

Yes. Xeon 5150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 5150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 5150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 5150 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon 5150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5335 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon 5150 vs Xeon E5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 5150

The Xeon 5150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,555 points. Launch price was $16.

Xeon E5335

The Xeon E5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,549 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 5150 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5335 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Xeon 5150 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5335 — a 28.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 5150 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon 5150 uses the Woodcrest (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon E5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 5150 scores 1,555 against the Xeon E5335's 1,549 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon 5150. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Xeon 5150 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5335.

Feature	Xeon 5150	Xeon E5335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.67 GHz+34%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.66 GHz+33%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Woodcrest (2006)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,555	1,549