Celeron G1830 vs Xeon 5150

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1830 vs Xeon 5150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1830 vs Xeon 5150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1830

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 65W, a 11W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Xeon 5150 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Xeon 5150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon 5150

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,555 vs 1,560).
❌20.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1830 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1830 better than Xeon 5150?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5150 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G1830 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1830 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1830 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1830 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $52 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1830 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1830 vs Xeon 5150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1830

The Celeron G1830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,560 points. Launch price was $85.

Xeon 5150

The Xeon 5150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,555 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1830 and Xeon 5150 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1830 versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon 5150 — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G1830 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron G1830 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon 5150 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1830 scores 1,560 against the Xeon 5150's 1,555 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G1830. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G1830 vs 0 kB on the Xeon 5150.

Feature	Celeron G1830	Xeon 5150
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+5%	2.67 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+5%	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4 MB+1500%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark	1,560	1,555
Geekbench 6 Single	496	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	910	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1830 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 5150 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1830	Xeon 5150
Socket	LGA1150	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1830) / not specified (Xeon 5150). The Celeron G1830 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Xeon 5150 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1830 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1830 rivals Pentium G3220.