Xeon 5160
VS
Core i5-13400F

Xeon 5160 vs Core i5-13400F

Intel

Xeon 5160

2 Cores2 Thrd80 WWMax: 3 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon 5160 is positioned at rank #903 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 5160

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
24222%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4573%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4063%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3139%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
99%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
98%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
97%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
96%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
96%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
96%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
96%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
95%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
95%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
93%
#903
Xeon 5160
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#906
Xeon E5405
MSRP: $209|Avg: $15
98%
#907
Xeon E5-2440
MSRP: $728|Avg: $249
98%
#916
Xeon E5-2650L
MSRP: $748|Avg: $129
94%
#918
Xeon E5410
MSRP: $256|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F

#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
107%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
107%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
106%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
106%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
105%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
105%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
104%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
104%
#74
Ryzen 5 5500GT
MSRP: $125|Avg: $130
104%
#75
Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP: $140|Avg: $185
76%
#75
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP: $309|Avg: $140
104%
#76
Ryzen 7 7700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
103%
#77
Ryzen 9 5900XT
MSRP: $349|Avg: $311
102%
#78
Core i5-12500
MSRP: $212|Avg: $140
101%
#79
Core i5-14600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $275
101%
#80
Ryzen 7 7700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $246
101%
#81
Core i5-13400F
MSRP: $196|Avg: $180
100%
#82
Core i3-12100T
MSRP: $125|Avg: $90
100%
#83
Core i7-11700F
MSRP: $298|Avg: $150
100%
#84
Core i3-10105F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $65
99%
#85
Core i5-9400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
98%
#86
Core i7-12700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
98%
#87
Core i5-12490F
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#88
Ryzen 5 5600GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $150
97%
#89
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
97%
#90
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
97%
#91
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
96%
#92
Ryzen 5 8600G
MSRP: $229|Avg: $190
96%
#93
Core i7-13700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
94%
#94
Ryzen 7 9700X
MSRP: $359|Avg: $285
94%
#95
Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP: $429|Avg: $370
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-13400F (2023) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon 5160Core i5-13400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Woodcrest (2006) / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon 5160 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon 5160Core i5-13400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 5160 and Core i5-13400F

Intel

Xeon 5160

The Xeon 5160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,715 points. Launch price was $22.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Xeon 5160 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon 5160 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon 5160 uses the Woodcrest (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 5160 scores 1,715 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 174.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Xeon 5160 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureXeon 5160Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.6 GHz+53%
Base Clock
3 GHz+20%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+220%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
65 nm
Intel 7 nm-89%
Architecture
Woodcrest (2006)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
1,715
25,029+1359%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 5160 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon 5160Core i5-13400F
Socket
LGA771
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon 5160) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureXeon 5160Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming