Xeon 5160
VS
Phenom II X4 900e

Xeon 5160 vs Phenom II X4 900e

Intel

Xeon 5160

2 Cores2 Thrd80 WWMax: 3 GHz2006
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 900e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon 5160 is positioned at rank 903 and the Phenom II X4 900e is on rank 373, so the Phenom II X4 900e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 5160

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
24222%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4573%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4063%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3139%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
99%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
98%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
97%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
96%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
96%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
96%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
96%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
95%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
95%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
93%
#903
Xeon 5160
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#906
Xeon E5405
MSRP: $209|Avg: $15
98%
#907
Xeon E5-2440
MSRP: $728|Avg: $249
98%
#916
Xeon E5-2650L
MSRP: $748|Avg: $129
94%
#918
Xeon E5410
MSRP: $256|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 900e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5415%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5116%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3715%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1119%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
886%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
775%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
444%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
438%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
399%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
399%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
395%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
384%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
379%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
377%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
374%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
100%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
98%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
98%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
97%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
97%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
96%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
96%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
95%
#373
Phenom II X4 900e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#378
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
97%
#385
Pentium G4560
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 5160 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon 5160Phenom II X4 900e
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Woodcrest (2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X4 900e ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon 5160Phenom II X4 900e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 5160 and Phenom II X4 900e

Intel

Xeon 5160

The Xeon 5160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,715 points. Launch price was $22.

AMD

Phenom II X4 900e

The Phenom II X4 900e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon 5160 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 900e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 900e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon 5160 versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X4 900e — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 5160 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon 5160 uses the Woodcrest (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Phenom II X4 900e uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 5160 scores 1,715 against the Phenom II X4 900e's 1,727 — a 0.7% lead for the Phenom II X4 900e. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Xeon 5160 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 900e.

FeatureXeon 5160Phenom II X4 900e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz+25%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+25%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
45 nm-31%
Architecture
Woodcrest (2006)
Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,715
1,727
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 5160 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 900e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon 5160Phenom II X4 900e
Socket
LGA771
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0