Xeon 6511P
VS
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Xeon 6511P vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Intel

Xeon 6511P

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6511P

#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
106%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
106%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
100%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
100%
#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
98%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($815) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 6511P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon 6511PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($815)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($815 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon 6511PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($815)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6511P and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Intel

Xeon 6511P

The Xeon 6511P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 51,286 points. Launch price was $815.

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,646 points. Launch price was $500.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon 6511P and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6511P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon 6511P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6511P scores 51,286 against the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's 51,646 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. L3 cache: 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6511P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395.

FeatureXeon 6511PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
16 / 32
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz
5.1 GHz+21%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
72 MB (total)+13%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark
51,286
51,646
Geekbench 6 Single
1,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
20,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6511P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6511P versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6511P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6511P) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). PCIe lanes: 136 (Xeon 6511P) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) — the Xeon 6511P offers 120 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6511P) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395).

FeatureXeon 6511PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Socket
LGA4710
FP11
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
8000+159900%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+3355443100%
128
RAM Channels
8+100%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
136+750%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6511P) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the Xeon 6511P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6511P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6511P rivals EPYC 9684X; Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX.

FeatureXeon 6511PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
AMD Radeon 8060S
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon 6511P launched at $815 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 debuted at $0. At current prices ($815 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is $815 cheaper.

FeatureXeon 6511PRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
MSRP
$815
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$815
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
62.9
Release Date
2025
2025