
Xeon 6736P vs Core Ultra 7 265

Xeon 6736P

Core Ultra 7 265
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6736P
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6736P | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,351) | ✅ More affordable ($320) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6736P | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+939%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,351) | ✅ More affordable ($320) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6736P and Core Ultra 7 265

Xeon 6736P
The Xeon 6736P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 50,072 points. Launch price was $3,351.

Core Ultra 7 265
The Core Ultra 7 265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,666 points. Launch price was $394.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6736P packs 36 cores / 72 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265 offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon 6736P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6736P versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265 — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon 6736P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6736P scores 50,072 against the Core Ultra 7 265's 49,666 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon 6736P. L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6736P vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265.
| Feature | Xeon 6736P | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 36 / 72+80% | 20 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 144 MB (total)+380% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+50% |
| Process | Intel 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 50,072 | 49,666 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6736P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6736P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6736P) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 265). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6736P) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265) — the Xeon 6736P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6736P) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265).
| Feature | Xeon 6736P | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400 | 6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+1500% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+267% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 265 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Xeon 6736P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon 6736P rivals EPYC 9684X; Core Ultra 7 265 rivals Ryzen 7 9700X.
| Feature | Xeon 6736P | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Arc Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6736P launched at $3351 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265 debuted at $384. At current prices ($3351 vs $320), the Core Ultra 7 265 is $3031 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6736P delivers 14.9 pts/$ vs 155.2 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265 — making the Core Ultra 7 265 the 164.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6736P | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3351 | $384-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3351 | $320-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 155.2+942% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















