PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6736P vs Xeon w7-3445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6736P vs Xeon w7-3445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6736P

2025

Why buy it

✅+2.2% higher PassMark.
✅+174.3% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 53 MB).
✅Draws 205W instead of 270W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3445 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($3,351 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).

Xeon w7-3445

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,362 less on MSRP ($1,989 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
✅Delivers 64.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 14.9 PassMark/$ ($1,989 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
✅27.3% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,991 vs 50,072).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 144 MB).
❌31.7% higher power demand at 270W vs 205W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6736P better than Xeon w7-3445?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w7-3445 is ahead with a 15.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6736P pulls ahead with 2.2% better PassMark. Xeon 6736P also has the bigger cache pool with 174.3% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 53 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6736P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 36 cores and 72 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 174.3% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 53 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6736P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon w7-3445 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6736P comes in 68.5% more expensive on MSRP at $3,351 MSRP versus $1,989 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon w7-3445 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon w7-3445 is also 64.8% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 14.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6736P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 174.3% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 53 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 36 cores / 72 threads instead of 20/40. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6736P vs Xeon w7-3445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6736P

The Xeon 6736P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 50,072 points. Launch price was $3,351.

Xeon w7-3445

The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6736P packs 36 cores / 72 threads, while the Xeon w7-3445 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon 6736P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6736P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3445 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon 6736P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6736P scores 50,072 against the Xeon w7-3445's 48,991 — a 2.2% lead for the Xeon 6736P. L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6736P vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445.

Feature	Xeon 6736P	Xeon w7-3445
Cores / Threads	36 / 72+80%	20 / 40
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	4.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	144 MB (total)+174%	52.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-57%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	50,072+2%	48,991

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6736P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Xeon 6736P versus 4800 on the Xeon w7-3445 — the Xeon 6736P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6736P) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3445) — the Xeon w7-3445 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6736P) and W790 (Xeon w7-3445).

Feature	Xeon 6736P	Xeon w7-3445
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	6400+33%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88	112+27%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3445 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon 6736P rivals EPYC 9684X; Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Xeon 6736P	Xeon w7-3445
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6736P was priced at $3351, while the Xeon w7-3445 came in at $1989. On launch pricing ($3351 vs $1989), Xeon w7-3445 was $1362 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6736P delivers 14.9 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3445 — making the Xeon w7-3445 the 49% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6736P	Xeon w7-3445
MSRP	$3351	$1989-41%
Performance per Dollar	14.9	24.6+65%
Release Date	2025	2023

Search Xeon 6736P on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3445 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.