EPYC 4465P vs Xeon 6736P

EPYC 4465P vs Xeon 6736P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4465P

12 / 24

50,216

+0.3%

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6736P

36 / 72

50,072

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4465P vs Xeon 6736P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4465P vs Xeon 6736P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4465P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,952 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
✅Delivers 742.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 14.9 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6736P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 144 MB).

Xeon 6736P

2025

Why buy it

✅+125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB).
✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4465P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (50,072 vs 50,216).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($3,351 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4465P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4465P better than Xeon 6736P?

Yes. EPYC 4465P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 18.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4465P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4465P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4465P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4465P comes in $2,952 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $3,351 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 742.3% better value on MSRP (125.9 vs 14.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6736P is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 4465P vs Xeon 6736P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4465P

The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.

Xeon 6736P

The Xeon 6736P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 50,072 points. Launch price was $3,351.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4465P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6736P offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon 6736P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6736P — a 27.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4465P (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6736P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the Xeon 6736P's 50,072 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 4465P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6736P.

Feature	EPYC 4465P	Xeon 6736P
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	36 / 72+200%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+32%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+70%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	144 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	50,216	50,072

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4465P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6736P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4465P versus 6400 on the Xeon 6736P — the Xeon 6736P supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6736P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4465P) vs 8 (Xeon 6736P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4465P) vs 88 (Xeon 6736P) — the Xeon 6736P offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6736P).

Feature	EPYC 4465P	Xeon 6736P
Socket	AM5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5200	6400+23%
Max RAM Capacity	128	4096+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	88+214%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4465P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4465P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6736P). The EPYC 4465P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6736P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K; Xeon 6736P rivals EPYC 9684X.

Feature	EPYC 4465P	Xeon 6736P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4465P was priced at $399, while the Xeon 6736P came in at $3351. On launch pricing ($399 vs $3351), EPYC 4465P was $2952 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 14.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6736P — making the EPYC 4465P the 157.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4465P	Xeon 6736P
MSRP	$399-88%	$3351
Performance per Dollar	125.9+745%	14.9
Release Date	2025	2025

Search EPYC 4465P on Amazon

Search Xeon 6736P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.