EPYC 4465P
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
EPYC 4465P vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4465P vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4465P vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4465P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,546 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1390.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 300W, a 235W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4465P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,189 vs 50,216).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($5,945 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌361.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4465P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4465P better than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4465P vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4465P
The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4465P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 27.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4465P (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 4465P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 32 / 64+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+32% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+21% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+7% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 50,216 | 50,189 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4465P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4465P versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4465P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4465P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200 | 5600+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4465P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4465P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). The EPYC 4465P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K; Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4465P was priced at $399, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ came in at $5945. On launch pricing ($399 vs $5945), EPYC 4465P was $5546 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — making the EPYC 4465P the 174.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-93% | $5945 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+1399% | 8.4 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4465P and Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
