EPYC 4465P
Xeon 6511P
EPYC 4465P vs Xeon 6511P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4465P vs Xeon 6511P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4465P vs Xeon 6511P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4465P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $416 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 62.9 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6511P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,216 vs 51,286).
Xeon 6511P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅385.7% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4465P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.9 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($815 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4465P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4465P better than Xeon 6511P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4465P vs Xeon 6511P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4465P
The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.
Xeon 6511P
The Xeon 6511P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 51,286 points. Launch price was $815.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4465P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6511P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6511P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6511P — a 25% clock advantage for the EPYC 4465P (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6511P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the Xeon 6511P's 51,286 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon 6511P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6511P.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon 6511P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+29% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+48% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 72 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 50,216 | 51,286+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4465P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6511P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4465P versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6511P — the Xeon 6511P supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6511P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4465P) vs 8 (Xeon 6511P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4465P) vs 136 (Xeon 6511P) — the Xeon 6511P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and C741 (Xeon 6511P).
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon 6511P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200 | DDR5-6400+23% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 136+386% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4465P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4465P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6511P). The EPYC 4465P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6511P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6511P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K; Xeon 6511P rivals EPYC 9684X.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon 6511P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4465P was priced at $399, while the Xeon 6511P came in at $815. On launch pricing ($399 vs $815), EPYC 4465P was $416 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 62.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6511P — making the EPYC 4465P the 66.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon 6511P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-51% | $815 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+100% | 62.9 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4465P and Xeon 6511P
