EPYC 4465P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
EPYC 4465P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4465P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4465P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4465P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 253.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 35.6 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (49,756 vs 50,216).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4465P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4465P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4465P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4465P
The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 49,756 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4465P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — a 1.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4465P (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX's 49,756 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 4465P. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+2% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 50,216 | 49,756 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4465P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 5200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4465P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4465P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX).
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200 | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 2048+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. The EPYC 4465P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX rivals Xeon w5-3435X.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4465P was priced at $399, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($399 vs $1399), EPYC 4465P was $1000 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 35.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — making the EPYC 4465P the 111.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-71% | $1399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+254% | 35.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4465P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
