EPYC 4465P vs EPYC 4484PX

EPYC 4465P vs EPYC 4484PX Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4465P

12 / 24

50,216

0.0%

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC 4484PX

12 / 24

50,547

+0.7%

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 7845HX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4465P vs EPYC 4484PX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4465P vs EPYC 4484PX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4465P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 84.4 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (50,216 vs 50,547).

EPYC 4484PX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.4 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4484PX better than EPYC 4465P?

Yes. EPYC 4484PX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4484PX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 64 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4484PX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4484PX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 4465P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4484PX comes in 50.1% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 4465P is also 49.1% better value on MSRP (125.9 vs 84.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4484PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 64 MB and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/24. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 4465P vs EPYC 4484PX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4465P

The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.

EPYC 4484PX

The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 4465P and EPYC 4484PX share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX — a 3.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 4484PX uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the EPYC 4484PX's 50,547 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 4484PX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX.

Feature	EPYC 4465P	EPYC 4484PX
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz	5.6 GHz+4%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	4.4 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	50,216	50,547
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	24,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,950
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 5200 memory speed. The EPYC 4484PX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX).

Feature	EPYC 4465P	EPYC 4484PX
Socket	AM5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4465P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4465P) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4465P) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4484PX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K; EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D.

Feature	EPYC 4465P	EPYC 4484PX
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use	—	Workstation / Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4465P was priced at $399, while the EPYC 4484PX came in at $599. On launch pricing ($399 vs $599), EPYC 4465P was $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 84.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 4484PX — making the EPYC 4465P the 39.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4465P	EPYC 4484PX
MSRP	$399-33%	$599
Performance per Dollar	125.9+49%	84.4
Release Date	2025	2024

Search EPYC 4465P on Amazon

Search EPYC 4484PX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.