
Core Ultra 7 265 vs Xeon 6736P

Core Ultra 7 265

Xeon 6736P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6736P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265 | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($320) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,351) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265 | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+939%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($320) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,351) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6736P

Core Ultra 7 265
The Core Ultra 7 265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,666 points. Launch price was $394.

Xeon 6736P
The Xeon 6736P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 50,072 points. Launch price was $3,351.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265 packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon 6736P offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon 6736P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6736P — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon 6736P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265 scores 49,666 against the Xeon 6736P's 50,072 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon 6736P. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265 vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6736P.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 36 / 72+80% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+29% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 144 MB (total)+380% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+50% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 49,666 | 50,072 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6736P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6736P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265) vs 8 (Xeon 6736P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265) vs 88 (Xeon 6736P) — the Xeon 6736P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6736P).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400 | 6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 265 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Xeon 6736P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265 rivals Ryzen 7 9700X; Xeon 6736P rivals EPYC 9684X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265 launched at $384 MSRP, while the Xeon 6736P debuted at $3351. At current prices ($320 vs $3351), the Core Ultra 7 265 is $3031 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265 delivers 155.2 pts/$ vs 14.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6736P — making the Core Ultra 7 265 the 164.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | Xeon 6736P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-89% | $3351 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320-90% | $3351 |
| Performance per Dollar | 155.2+942% | 14.9 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















