Core Ultra 7 265 vs EPYC 4484PX
Core Ultra 7 265
EPYC 4484PX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4484PX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 4484PX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($320) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($599) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 4484PX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+84%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($320) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($599) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265 and EPYC 4484PX
Core Ultra 7 265
The Core Ultra 7 265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,666 points. Launch price was $394.
EPYC 4484PX
The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265 packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 4484PX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265 versus 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX — a 5.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 4484PX uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265 scores 49,666 against the EPYC 4484PX's 50,547 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 4484PX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 4484PX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+67% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.6 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz+83% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+327% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 49,666 | 50,547+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 24,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,950 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 17,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4484PX uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265 versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4484PX — the Core Ultra 7 265 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 7 265 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265) vs 28 (EPYC 4484PX) — the EPYC 4484PX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 4484PX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+127900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 192 GB+78643100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 28+17% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 7 265) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4484PX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265 rivals Ryzen 7 9700X; EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 4484PX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | — | Workstation / Server |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265 launched at $384 MSRP, while the EPYC 4484PX debuted at $599. At current prices ($320 vs $599), the Core Ultra 7 265 is $279 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265 delivers 155.2 pts/$ vs 84.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 4484PX — making the Core Ultra 7 265 the 59.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 4484PX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-36% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320-47% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 155.2+84% | 84.4 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265 and EPYC 4484PX
