Core Ultra 7 265 vs EPYC 7413
Core Ultra 7 265
EPYC 7413
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7413
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($320) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($450) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+38%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($320) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($450) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265 and EPYC 7413
Core Ultra 7 265
The Core Ultra 7 265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,666 points. Launch price was $394.
EPYC 7413
The EPYC 7413 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,641 points. Launch price was $1,825.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265 packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7413 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7413 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265 versus 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7413 — a 38.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.65 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 7413 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265 scores 49,666 against the EPYC 7413's 50,641 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 7413. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7413.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 24 / 48+20% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+47% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.65 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+327% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 49,666 | 50,641+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7413 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265 versus 3200 on the EPYC 7413 — the Core Ultra 7 265 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7413 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265) vs 8 (EPYC 7413). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265) vs 128 (EPYC 7413) — the EPYC 7413 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265) and SP3 (EPYC 7413).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+100% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 265 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the EPYC 7413 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265 rivals Ryzen 7 9700X; EPYC 7413 rivals Xeon Gold 6338.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265 launched at $384 MSRP, while the EPYC 7413 debuted at $1825. At current prices ($320 vs $450), the Core Ultra 7 265 is $130 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265 delivers 155.2 pts/$ vs 112.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 7413 — making the Core Ultra 7 265 the 31.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-79% | $1825 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320-29% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 155.2+38% | 112.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265 and EPYC 7413
