EPYC 7413 vs Xeon 6736P

EPYC 7413 vs Xeon 6736P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7413

24 / 48

50,641

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6736P

36 / 72

50,072

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7413 vs Xeon 6736P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7413 vs Xeon 6736P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7413

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,526 less on MSRP ($1,825 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
✅Delivers 85.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.7 vs 14.9 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 205W, a 25W reduction.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6736P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6736P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6736P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (50,072 vs 50,641).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($3,351 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7413 better than Xeon 6736P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6736P is ahead with a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7413 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7413 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7413 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7413 comes in $1,526 cheaper on MSRP at $1,825 MSRP versus $3,351 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon 6736P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 85.7% better value on MSRP (27.7 vs 14.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6736P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7413 vs Xeon 6736P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7413

The EPYC 7413 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,641 points. Launch price was $1,825.

Xeon 6736P

The Xeon 6736P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 50,072 points. Launch price was $3,351.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7413 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6736P offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon 6736P has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7413 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6736P — a 13% clock advantage for the Xeon 6736P (base: 2.65 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7413 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon 6736P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7413 scores 50,641 against the Xeon 6736P's 50,072 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7413. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7413 vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6736P.

Feature	EPYC 7413	Xeon 6736P
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	36 / 72+50%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4.1 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.65 GHz+32%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	144 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	50,641+1%	50,072

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7413 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6736P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7413 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6736P — the Xeon 6736P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7413) vs 88 (Xeon 6736P) — the EPYC 7413 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7413) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6736P).

Feature	EPYC 7413	Xeon 6736P
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7413 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon 6736P rivals EPYC 9684X.

Feature	EPYC 7413	Xeon 6736P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7413 was priced at $1825, while the Xeon 6736P came in at $3351. On launch pricing ($1825 vs $3351), EPYC 7413 was $1526 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7413 delivers 27.7 pts/$ vs 14.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6736P — making the EPYC 7413 the 60% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7413	Xeon 6736P
MSRP	$1825-46%	$3351
Performance per Dollar	27.7+86%	14.9
Release Date	2021	2025

Search EPYC 7413 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6736P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.